The Aesthetics and Politics of Volcanoes: William Hamilton’s Campi Phlegraei

The position of the observer or the perspective of the picture is often an ele-vated one. The British aristocrat seems to be overlooking the Mediterranean land-scape, as it were with a colonial gaze. Mary Louise Pratt described this view in her study Imperial Eyes as a “monarch-of-all-I-survey” scene: the aristocratic repre-sentative of an imperial power visits a foreign nature and symbolically dominates it (Pratt 1992: 202 (and passim)).

Mostly, however, the observer and his draftsman are not alone in the landscape. Often we see other people, other groups of hikers or travelers who have nothing to do with them. Someone is always already there. Nowhere is one the first here. Nature is never truly wild and remote from humans. There is a lot of civilization in Fabris’s drawings: ships, cities, buildings, roads, farm animals and fields.

Prince Franz von Anhalt-Dessau was so enthusiastic after his visit to Hamilton in Naples that he had a replica of the latter’s villa and a miniature of Vesuvius built in his park at Wörlitz in east Germany. It was even artificially erupted from time to time. Hamilton himself, when he returned to England from his diplomatic post, passed through the area with his wife and with Nelson. Already during his lifetime he had inspired an experiential staging of volcanic nature.

 3. William Hamilton and Pietro Fabris on the island of Nisida, overlooking a lake in a former volcanic crater (Plate XXII of Hamilton’s Campi Phlegraei, 1776
3. William Hamilton and Pietro Fabris on the island of Nisida, overlooking a lake in a former volcanic crater (Plate XXII of Hamilton’s Campi Phlegraei, 1776